Flag
Cuban Anthem

No Castro nor his regime !

Escudo

 

updated 08/03/04

What's New
Events
Commentaries
Elián Archive
News Archive
Castro's Accomplices
Education
Atrocities
Embargo
Terrorism
Facts & Figures
Image Gallery
You Can Help
Personalities
Religion
Documents
Links
Contact Us
Home

News Release

Printed in The Washington Times newspaper, January 21, 2000

LINCOLN DIAZ-BALART

U.S. CONGRESSMAN - DISTRICT 21, FLORIDA

Elian's Due Process Rights Must be Protected

by Lincoln Diaz-Balart

The case of 6 year-old Elian Gonzalez constitutes an alarming example of the lengths to which the Clinton Administration will go to placate the Cuban dictatorship.

Elian miraculously survived a desperate voyage that saw the drowning of his mother and her husband. Elian's mother denied herself the little drinking water she possessed so that Elian might have a chance to live. The two adults who survived the voyage describe how Elian's mother would constantly cry-out the prayer that her son survive and reach freedom in the United States.

Elian was rescued by American fishermen on Thanksgiving Day and taken to a hospital in South Florida. A few days later he was placed by the INS in the care of his father's relatives in Miami, legally admitted into the U.S. and the family has unquestionably provided Elian with a loving environment.

When the INS legally admitted Elian and placed him in the care of his relatives in South Florida, it issued the following statement, on December 1, 1999:

"Although INS has no role in the family custody decision process, we have discussed this case with State of Florida officials who have confirmed that the issue of legal custody must be decided by its state court. Elian will remain in the U.S. until the issues surrounding his custody are resolved. If Elian's family is unable to resolve the question of his custody, it is our understanding that the involved parties will have to file in Florida family court. Either Elian's father in Cuba or his U.S.-based family members may initiate proceedings."

The Cuban dictator was profoundly disturbed by recent public relations debacles such as the November Ibero-American Summit in Havana where the Cuban internal opposition received significant international media attention, and by having had to cancel his scheduled visit to the Seattle WTO meeting due to his publicly acknowledged fear of being arrested for having personally ordered the murders of U.S. citizens. Accordingly, Castro came up with a public relations stunt to divert attention from his recent defeats.

On December 5, 1999, he issued a "72-hour ultimatum" to President Clinton, demanding that the U.S. make clear that it would return Elian to Cuba. 48 hours later, President Clinton ordered the INS to reverse its own position, that it had made public on December 1, and thus began the Clinton campaign to return Elian to totalitarian Cuba.

The law is clear (the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act, the Parental Kidnaping Prevention Act, the Hague Conventions of 1960 and 1980) that only a court of law may rule on the custody of a minor.

A Florida Court, on January 10, 2000, granted Elian's great uncle in Miami temporary custody of the minor pending a full evidentiary hearing on the matter of custody on March 6. The court held that "if Elian is returned to Cuba he faces the threat of mistreatment or abuse including the loss of any due process rights." The Court asked that Elian's father come to present his views pursuant to the law.

Inconceivably, Attorney General Reno stated that the Clinton Administration would ignore the Court Order.

No one can ignore a Court Order in this country. If the Attorney General disagrees with a Court Order, she may seek to quash or overturn it in Court, but she cannot legally ignore it. Furthermore, Attorney General Reno misrepresented the Florida Court's Order by stating that it had ruled on Federal immigration matters when it clearly did not. The Court simply granted temporary custody to Elian Gonzalez's great-uncle in South Florida pending a full hearing on March 6.

Why must Congress be willing to get involved? Because this issue cuts to the bone of who we are as a nation. Because the Clinton Administration has unconscionably placed the full power of the federal government against a 6 year-old boy who it seeks to return to the life of oppression which his mother died to free him from. Because the last will and testament of his mother, valiantly expressed by the offering of her life, deserves its full day in court. Because Congress needs to investigate the Clinton Administration's abrupt change of its own decision in this case, 48 hours into Castro's "ultimatum". Because Elian must not be sent back to a life of totalitarianism before the critical issue of his custody can be fully dealt with by our Courts under the Rule of Law.