Flag
Cuban Anthem

No Castro nor his regime !

Escudo

 

updated 08/03/04

What's New
Events
Commentaries
Elián Archive
News Archive
Castro's Accomplices
Education
Atrocities
Embargo
Terrorism
Facts & Figures
Image Gallery
You Can Help
Personalities
Religion
Documents
Links
Contact Us
Home

November 21, 2001

THE ANTHRAX CONNECTION – THE POISONED LAMB

Part I

            After the September 11th attack, every day new cases appear of anthrax contamination caused by unknown terrorists whose aim is to disrupt the institutional and financial infrastructure of our country with a threat that physically and/or psychologically reaches every person in the nation.

            In view of this, two things are mandatory:  1) be alert to prevent contamination, and afford immediate medical treatment to anyone actually or probably infected, and, 2) make every effort to determine the source where the anthrax and other chemical or biological weapons are produced and eliminate those sources.

            For some time, Iraq has been known to produce chemical and biological weapons and the United Nations has made efforts to inspect the installations suspected of producing same.  However, little if any attention has been given to another sworn enemy of this country: Fidel Castro, even though his regime is among those listed by the Department of State as promoting terrorism. 

Indeed, for years the Cuban dictator has been building an array of chemical plants, originally with the aid of the now defunct Soviet Union.  In the sequence of this writing we shall provide a detailed description of where those plants are located in Cuba.

            As we said in the beginning, to this date the source of the anthrax used in the recent cases of infection in the U.S. has not been determined; but we must place ourselves in a state of alert as to the location of the terrorists producing these or other chemical and biological weapons.  In this respect, we must take into account a number of facts, events and circumstances which point to Fidel Castro. In a variety of legal scenarios, proven inclination and opportunity are sufficient to imply guilt, even if the smoking gun be missing.  Let us examine some relevant case histories.

            The practice of hijacking airplanes began in the sixties, when planes were hijacked in the US by bank robbers and other fugitives and forced to fly to Cuba, where the fugitives remain to this day under Castro’s protection.  From that beginning, the practice extended worldwide until the tragic events of September 11th.

            During the missile crisis of October, 1962, Castro urged Nikita Khrushchev to fire a missile with a nuclear warhead against the U.S.  Fortunately, Khrushchev did not follow the suggestion.

            Castro has hosted, trained and armed terrorist groups targeting all of the Americas, from Canada to Argentina, as well as the Basque Etarras in Spain.  A detailed report on this activity will appear in the continuation of this writing.

            The present Cuban regime has built in Cuba state-of-the-art facilities to produce biochemical weapons such as anthrax, and has experimented with them in Africa, specifically in Angola, where Castro’s army intervened in the civil war to bolster the communist Luanda regime.

            As recently as May, 2001, at a gathering in Iran at the University of Teheran, Castro told students: “Together, Iran and Cuba will bring the U.S. to its knees”.

            Right here in the U.S., the Castro action is not speculative, but very real.  This year, a federal jury found five Cuban residents of Florida guilty of spying for the Cuban government and seeking information on American military bases.  More recently, two weeks after the September 11th attack, a highly placed official in the Pentagon, Ana Belen Montes, was arrested by the F.B.I. for transmitting very sensitive military and strategic information to the Castro regime.

            Lately, on several occasions, when talking about possible conflicts between the Cuban regime and the U.S., Castro has cautioned the latter to beware of “the poisoned lamb”.  What he has meant by this enigmatic phrase is not clear, but placed in the context of the recent terrorist attacks, and particularly of the spread of the anthrax bacteria, perhaps it begins to make sense.  When we reflect that it is not logical or practical to bring anthrax into this country from a far away source such as Iran, when it can be introduced by anyone of the many travelers that return to the U.S. from Cuba, either directly or through third countries, and who go through customs here with remarkable ease.

TO BE CONTINUED – PART II -             The factories of terror