|
Published Thursday,
October 19, 2000, in the Miami Herald
Senate passes embargo bill
Legislation would OK food sales to
Cuba for first time in 40 years
BY ANA RADELAT
Special to The Herald
The Senate gave final congressional approval Wednesday to a $78
billion farm spending bill that modestly eases the trade embargo
against Cuba, ending a bitter months-long standoff and making both
winners and losers of all the combatants.
The bill, approved 86-8, would allow the sale of food to Cuba for the
first time in four decades, but is restricted because it bars the
federal government or U.S. banks from financing the shipments.
Florida Sens. Bob
Graham, a Democrat, and Connie Mack, a Republican, both voted in favor
of the bill, which President Clinton is expected to sign.
Farm groups eager to
trade with Cuba say the legislation is a start.
``Hopefully, it will
be a step toward a broader opening,'' said Sen. Tim Hutchinson, an
Arkansas Republican whose state's farmers hope to sell rice to Cuba.
Sean Garcia,
executive director of the Cuban Committee for Democracy, said,
``Everybody got a little bit of something. We have won some, and lost
some.''
Garcia said that the
big win for the CCD, a 5,000-member exile group that supported easing
food sanctions on Havana, is that ``for the first time proponents of
the embargo have had their hold on the agenda irreparably broken.''
But Garcia cites as
losses the deal's restrictions on sales to Cuba and the ``immediate
setback'' posed by a provision in the agreement that strips the
president of his power to expand U.S. travel to Cuba.
The restrictions on
sales to Cuba and the travel freeze were hailed as big victories by
Reps. Lincoln Díaz-Balart and Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, Miami Republicans.
In fact, for Díaz-Balart
the compromise bill represented ``the most significant victory since
I've been in Congress.''
Díaz-Balart said
congressional fervor over making China a permanent preferential trade
partner had created a free-trade ``tidal wave'' that threatened to
sweep away the 40-year-old embargo -- and that was stopped. Moreover,
Díaz-Balart was concerned that ``there would be a major Clinton
initiative'' that would open up U.S. travel to Cuba.
Under the new
legislation, Cuban President Fidel Castro's government would be
required to pay for U.S. agricultural products in cash or through
financing by foreign banks -- no U.S. private or government financing
could be used. Havana has denounced the conditions as ``discriminatory
and humiliating.''
But the agreement
does not impose those restrictions on other nations affected by the
deal -- North Korea, Libya, Sudan and Iran. To placate key farm state
lawmakers who opposed the restrictions on Cuba, GOP leaders abandoned
their insistence that sales to Iran carry the same restrictions as
those to Cuba.
When Clinton signs
the bill into law, the biggest winner will be U.S. agribusiness.
Unfettered by the restrictions that apply to Cuba, U.S. banks can be
involved in food sales to North Korea, Libya, Sudan -- as well as
Iran, potentially a much bigger market than Cuba.
``There's a real
possibility that there will be big sales to Iran,'' said Mary Kay
Thatcher, a lobbyist with the American Farm Bureau Federation.
Cuban American
National Foundation Executive Vice President Dennis Hays said his
anti-Castro group preferred the status quo.
``Our position was,
that if nothing at all happened, that's good,'' Hays said.
In addition, Hays
worried that the momentum to ease the embargo has not been halted.
``The agriculture
guys will try to create a market in Cuba, they'll lobby Congress to
allow [U.S.] tourism to Cuba. They'll say `we've got to give them
tourists or who will buy our chicken parts,' '' Hays said.
Pressure to remove at
the restrictions on the sale of food and medicine to Cuba peaked in
this session of Congress because American farm groups and the U.S.
Chamber of Commerce stepped up an anti-sanctions drive.
The result was an
agreement brokered between Republicans seeking new markets for their
farmers and GOP congressional leaders intent on keeping the embargo
intact.
A deal was needed
because the dispute over Cuba had for months blocked progress on the
huge agriculture appropriations bill.
The House approved
the farm bill last week with a 340-75 vote.
This report was
supplemented by Herald wire services.
Copyright 2000 the
Miami Herald.
Republished here with the permission of the Miami Herald. No further
republication or redistribution is permitted without the written
approval of The Miami Herald.
|