|
On 13 July 1994 at least 35 men, women and
children were lost at sea when the vessel on which they and others were attempting to flee
Cuba sank some seven miles out from Havana. The 31 survivors were eventually picked up by
coast guards and taken to shore where the 20 male survivors were detained. Several of the
survivors allege that their vessel sank after it had been pursued and assaulted by three
other vessels, apparently acting under official instructions, and that those on board were
given no opportunity to surrender. The Cuban Government denied any responsibility for the
sinking of the tugboat or for the loss of life, alleging that it was an accident caused by
the irresponsible actions of those on board. However, Amnesty International has received
compelling evidence, including eyewitness testimony from several of the survivors,
indicating that those on board the three pursuing vessels employed excessive force
disproportionate to the actual situation and seemed to be taking orders from a fourth
vessel. They allege that their pursuers deliberately rammed the 13 de Marzo
and undertook other aggressive actions which deliberately put at risk the lives of those
on board, none of whom, from the information so far available, even from government
sources, were armed or in a position to seriously resist capture. If this was the case,
Amnesty International believes that those who perished in the incident were the victims of
extrajudicial execution.
On 21 July 1994 Amnesty International called on the Cuban
authorities to conduct a full and impartial investigation into the incident and to make
the findings public, and that if the investigation revealed that any government official
or agent acting on their behalf committed an offence, to bring them to justice and to give
them a fair trial. It also called for the release of any survivors detained as a result of
the incident unless they were charged with a recognized criminal offence and urged that no
reprisals be taken against those who spoke out about what happened. Since then, despite
calls to do so from human rights defenders inside Cuba and international human rights
bodies, the Cuban authorities have not only failed to carry out an adequate investigation
of the incident but have also continued to harass and intimidate those inside Cuba who
have sought to peacefully protest the sinking of the 13 de Marzo or
commemorate the lives of those who died.
Context
It is important to describe the context in which the
sinking of the 13 de Marzo took place. In order to leave the country,
either to emigrate or simply to travel and return to Cuba, Cuban citizens have to obtain
an official exit permit. Those who seek permission to emigrate have to be in possession of
a visa for another country and fulfill a series of other requirements, including the
payment of certain fees. In practice, it is very difficult for most Cubans to meet such
conditions. Many resort to trying to leave by illegal means, usually by sea, often
floating on homemade rafts or inner tubes of tyres. Over the years many people have
reportedly perished trying to make the 90-mile crossing to the United States over the
Straits of Florida. Sometimes, even if those wishing to emigrate have fulfilled the
necessary conditions, the authorities arbitrarily refuse to let them leave or give
permission to some family members and not others. Being caught trying to leave illegally
is punishable by imprisonment or a fine but if violence is employed, a more serious charge
of piracy can be brought.
The desire to emigrate is in itself seen by the Cuban
authorities as tantamount to a rejection of the Cuban political systemSee footnote 1 and those who seek to do so are often labelled as
counter-revolutionaries or traitors. In the two or three years
leading up to the sinking of the 13 de Marzo, when economic conditions
in Cuba had seriously deteriorated, there had been a significant increase in the
number of Cubans attempting to leave Cuba by sea to try to reach the United States which
had until that time had a policy of permitting those Cubans who reached its territory to
remain in the USA. At the same time, despite having agreed in 1984 to accept up to 20,000
Cubans who sought to emigrate by legal means, the US authorities had in practice reduced
the number of visas it granted to Cubans. The Cuban Government therefore claimed that, by
withholding visas, the US authorities were encouraging Cubans to resort to illegal means
to leave. They also accused them of inciting such action via radio and television
broadcasts directed at Cuba by the US government- funded Radio and TV Martí. Given the
traditional hostility that has existed between the Cuban and US Governments since the
Cuban revolution in 1959 which brought President Fidel Castro Ruz to power, the argument
over Cuban migration in effect became yet another political battleground between the two
countries with those who were seeking to leave Cuba caught as pawns in the middle.
The sinking of the 13 de Marzo
increased the general level of discontent that clearly already existed in Havana at the
time and sparked off further escape attempts as well as anti-government protests. In the
days that followed, the Cuban authorities apparently took a conscious decision to cease
preventing illegal departures and the numbers of people trying to leave Cuba illegally by
sea soared. In some instances, large groups of people tried to hi-jack public ferries and
other vessels, in some cases by violent means. On 19 August 1994, in response to the
exodus that ensued, the US Government ordered the US Coast Guard to prevent undocumented
Cubans from reaching US territorial waters. As a result, between 19 August and
mid-September 1994, some 32,000 Cubans were intercepted by the US Coast Guard and taken to
the US naval base at Guantánamo Bay, CubaSee
footnote 2. On 9 September 1994, the two governments announced that they had come to
an agreement on how to deal with migration issues for the future. As part of the
agreement, the Cuban authorities said it would take effective measures in every way
it can to prevent unsafe departures, using mainly persuasive methods. For further
information, see United States/Cuba: Rafters - Pawns of Two
Governments, AMR 51/86/94, October 1994.
It is important to note that the escape attempt by those
on board the 13 de Marzo took place at a point when the Cuban
authorities were actively seeking to deter and prevent such illegal departures. It is also
relevant to point out that it is not the first time, either before or since, that Amnesty
International has received reports of apparently excessive force being used by the Cuban
authorities to prevent illegal departures by sea where the lives of unarmed civilians,
often women and children, appear to have been put at risk.
Accounts by survivors
[Victims: Estrella Suárez Esquivel, Miralis
Fernández Rodríguez and 12-year-old Eliecer Suárez García ]
According to an account compiled by an unofficial Cuban
human rights group on the basis of interviews carried out with some of the survivors on
the day after the sinking of the 13 de Marzo took place, events took
place as follows:
"The boat left [the port of Havana] at about 3.00am.
About 45 minutes later, having advanced nearly seven miles out to sea, they were
intercepted by another Japanese-made tugboat which started to ram them in order to make
them capsize. Another tugboat soon appeared and, taking over from the first one, continued
doing the same thing. All [the passengers] were trapped between these two boats, which
then began to direct water at them with high-pressure hoses.The force of this tore
the clothes off the women, knocked them down, and forced the children out of their arms.
"The mothers screamed and implored the attackers to
stop directing the water hoses at them because they might cause the young ones to drown.
The perpetrators continued using the hoses against the citizens, including the children,
trying to drown them by suffocation. Many of the men, women and children on board were
injured by the pressure of the water which threw them against the bulwarks of the boat.
Seconds later, a third tugboat appeared and attacked forcefully from behind, splitting the
boat in two since it was an old Second World war boat which had been repaired and was
called 13 de Marzo.
"All those on board were submerged in the water
including those who had taken refuge in the engine room where they were trying to hang on
to poles, ropes and whatever they could find. After nearly an hour of battling in the open
sea, the other boats circled round the survivors, creating a whirlpool so that they would
drown. As a result many disappeared into the sea and lost their lives."
[Victims: Julia Caridad Ruiz with three-year-old son,
Angel René Abreu ]
The following are extracts from the testimony of survivor
Janette Hernández Gutiérrez, now living in the USA, which was provided to an
unofficial human rights group in Cuba in the days immediately after the incident occurred:
"As we were leaving the bay, we
saw two tugboats at the mouth of the bay. As we left, they also left and started directing
jets of water at us. Constantly. They would not stop, even though they knew there were
children on board... the pressurized water jets were really powerful. We were holding the
children, afraid that they would fall. The men were standing behind us, afraid that we
would fall. But so that they would see that there were women and children on board, we had
to go out on deck, so that they would be certain of that and would not commit murder ...
At no time did they shoot at us neither did they at any time order us to halt with the
loudspeaker. They simply let us leave the bay and attacked us seven miles out where there
are no witnesses... They sent one of the tugboats, the biggest one, which was green with a
red line along it, behind us and it hit us from the stern and broke our boat in half ...
When that happened the boat started to drift because the captain... was forced into the
sea from the pressure of the water jets.... he disappeared just like that and when Raúl
saw that we were drifting, he assumed responsibility and ran upstairs..... By then we knew
we were going to sink, it was something I just knew, I had a feeling they were going to
kill us because otherwise they would have stopped . Raúl stopped the engine... and when
they saw that Raúl had stopped it, they did not forgive that or respect what Raúl did.
They sank us in the following way: the tugboat which had split our stern went ahead and
split us from the prow. That meant there was no way to keep the tugboat afloat, it was
sinking, because the weight was all in the middle... But they did not throw us lifebelts
or try to help us in any way... Then a "griffin" [coastguard vessel] arrived, it
was the only one which helped us by throwing us lifebelts but the tugboats stood by doing
nothing, they did not help at all. Later a small speedboat arrived and picked up about
seven people..."
[Victims: Omar Rodríguez Suárez with two-year-old
daughter Sixdy Rodríguez Fernández ]
Amnesty International has received similar accounts from
interviews it has carried out with other survivors who were eventually able to leave Cuba
during the August 1994 exodus (see above). In September 1994, an Amnesty International
delegation visited the US Naval Base at Guantánamo Bay, CubaSee footnote 3, where thousands of Cubans were in detention after
being picked up by the US Coast Guard while trying to reach the USA by sea. One of the men
interviewed by the delegation was one of about five people in the camps said to be among
the 31 survivors of the sinking of the "13 de Marzo" and who had
subsequently again tried to flee from Cuba. According to his account of events on 13 July
1994, the 13 de Marzo had already been detected by the authorities as
it was leaving the port of Havana and three vessels, all also tugboats, started to pursue
it straightaway. However, they were able to continue into open sea. The first pursuing
vessel began to direct jets of water at them. Then two of the pursuing tugboats
deliberately rammed the 13 de Marzo while the third, despite their
protestations that there were women and children on board, continued to persistently
direct jets of water into the hold. Once the 13 de Marzo started
sinking, the other three boats backed off but did not immediately attempt to rescue those
on board. He himself was by this time in the water. At a certain point he got the
impression that orders were given to pick them up. He was picked up by what he described
as the "least aggressive" of the three vessels. He said that those on board the
three attacking vessels were dressed in civilian clothes but he did not believe, as the
Cuban authorities alleged, that they were ordinary dockworkers, especially as several of
the crew of one boat appeared to be suffering from seasickness. He was arrested, along
with the other male survivors, and held at Villa Marista for 13 days before being released
into house arrest. At the time he left Cuba, another detainee, Raúl Muñoz García,
was still in detention accused of being in charge of the tugboat and organizer of the
escape attempt. However, he said that in fact Raúl Muñoz was only second-in-command and
that the man in chargeSee footnote 4 had drowned.
Raúl Muñoz was reportedly released into house arrest after eight months in detention but
is said to have been subjected to police surveillance and harassment ever since.
[Victim: eleven-year-old Yousel Pérez Tacaronte ]
Another survivor interviewed by Amnesty International in
the USA in May 1996, Sergio Perodin Pérez, said that their departure was detected
by the port authorities as they were leaving the port and that passers by on shore had
also noticed what was happening. However, the 13 de Marzo was allowed
to continue on its way for about seven miles. He pointed out that one of the effects of
everything inside the tugboat being drenched with water from the pressurized water jets
was that their communications equipment no longer worked and they were unable to call for
help. In fact, he believes, from information that he and other survivors were able to
obtain from various sources, including people working in the Port of Havana, after the
incident took place, that the authorities had found out about the escape attempt some time
beforehand and were lying in wait for them. At no point did the pursuing vessels warn
those on board what they were going to do or give them any opportunity to give themselves
up. When a foreign cargo boat came within some 800 metres of where the 13 de
Marzo was sinking, the vessels which were attacking it temporarily suspended
their activities. After he and some 40 other people had been forced into the water, the
three attacking tugboats surrounded them, causing a whirlpool. At one point, he said he
heard one of the occupants of the attacking vessels say, Let's see what you are
going to do now, you sons of whores. A coastguard vessel which had followed the 13
de Marzo and the other three tugboats out of the port, and which appeared to be
directing operations by radio, eventually picked him and others up. However, rather than
taking them straight to shore for medical attention, the boat continued sailing around for
some six hours until it was given the order to go to Jaimanitas on the western outskirts
of Havana, where they were received by 50-60 Interior Ministry officials. The survivors,
who were brought to land on two or three different vessels, were desperate to know what
had happened to the others who were on board the 13 de Marzo. When they
asked the authorities who else had survived, they were simply told that if they could not
see them, then the sharks had eaten them. The women and children were allowed to go home
later that day but the men were handcuffed and questioned until evening when they were
transferred to the State Security headquarters at Villa Marista in Havana. For the first
two days, they were not allowed to sleep much and had to sleep on the floor but once the
women survivors started speaking out about what had happened, their treatment improved. He
said that the authorities tried by various means to persuade them to change their story.
In his case, a psychologist was brought in to work with him. Another of the survivors was
reportedly offered a job working with State Security outside of Cuba which he refused to
do.
Among the 20 male survivors arrested were: Raúl
Muñoz García, Sergio Perodin Pérez, Modesto Almanza Romero, Daniel González
Hernández, Juan Gustavo Martínez Gutiérrez, José Fabian Valdés, Arquimides Ledreijo
Gamboa, Román Lugo Martínez, Fidel González, Eugenio Fuentes Díaz, Ivan Prieto
Suárez, Daniel Prieto Suárez and Jorge Luis Cuba Suárez. They were
reportedly detained at Villa Marista, with no access to lawyers. All except Raúl Muñoz
García, who was detained for eight months (see above), were held for approximately one
month before being released into house arrest. It is not clear whether any formal charges
were brought against any of them. One female survivor, María Victoria García Suárez,
who lost thirteen relatives in the tragedy and who the day afterwards made statements to
foreign journalists contradicting the official version, was twice taken into custody for
questioning in the days immediately following the incident. She is said to have been
severely traumatized by what happened and to have spent some time in the Havana
Psychiatric Hospital. She and other survivors who have remained in Cuba have reportedly
been kept under police surveillance and been subjected to limitations on their freedom of
movement. All have been repeatedly warned not to speak out about what happened to them.
The vessels which attacked the 13 de
Marzo were reportedly identified as belonging to the Ministry of Transport and
are called Polargo 2", Polargo 3" and Polargo
5". According to survivors, Polargo 5" was the vessel which
acted most aggressively towards them. The fourth vessel which followed along behind them
and which appeared to be directing operations was believed to belong to the Cuban Coast
Guard, which is part of the Ministry of the Interior.
The victims
Estimates of the number of victims have varied. Most
survivors concur that there were some 70-72 people on board the tugboat when it departed.
According to the Cuban Government, 32 people drowned and 31 were rescued. However, an
investigation carried out by an independent human rights group inside Cuba found that at
least 37 people were missing. So far Amnesty International has received the names of 35
people who were lost at sea. Most came from four areas of Havana - Cotorro, Guanabacoa,
Marianao and Arroyo Naranjo. Many were members of the same family.
NAMES OF THOSE WHO DIED
Arroyo Naranjo:
Angel René ABREU Ruiz, 3
Jorge Arquimides LEBRIGIO Flores, 28
Julia Caridad RUIZ Blanco, 35
Cotorro:
Pilar ALMANZA Romero, 30
Yaltamira ANAYA Carrasco, 22
Marta CARRASCO Tamayo, 45
Yuliana ENRIQUEZ Carranza, 23
Sindy RODRIGUEZ Fernández, 2
Manuel GAYOL, 58
Caridad LEYVA Tacoronte, 4
Reinaldo MARRERO, 48
Helen MARTINEZ Enríquez, 6 months
Marjolís MENDEZ Tacoronte, 17
Odalys MUÑOZ García, 21
José Carlos NIKEL Anaya, 3
Leonardo NOTARIO Góngora, 27
Yousel Eugenio PEREZ Tacoronte, 11
Yasse (or Yasser) PERODIN Almanza, 11
Marta Caridad TACORONTE Vega, 33
Guanabacoa:
Ernesto ALFONSO Loureiro, 25
Lissette María ALVAREZ Guerra, 24
Giselle (or Lisette) BORGES Alvarez, 4
Lázaro BORGES Briel, 34
Joel GARCIA Suárez, 24
Armando GONZALEZ Raíz (or Raizes), 50
Augusto Guillermo GUERRA Martínez, 45
Mario GUTIERREZ, 35
Elio Juan GUTIERREZ García, 10
Fidelio Ramel PRIETO Hernández, 50
Marianao:
Miralis FERNANDEZ Rodríguez, 27
Eduardo SUAREZ Esquivel, 35
Eliecer SUAREZ García, 11
Estrella SUAREZ Esquivel, 45
Yolindis RODRIGUEZ Rivero, 2
Omar RODRIGUEZ Suárez, 30
Government version of events
Conflicting reports of the incident appeared
in the Cuban media, which are entirely state- controlled, some alleging that the 13
de Marzo sank simply because it was very old and not seaworthy and others saying
that it sank because it had accidentally collided with the pursuing vessels. On 14 July
1994, the day after the tragedy, Granma, the official Communist Party newspaper, in
an article entitled Capsized Tugboat robbed by Anti-Social Elements described
what happened as an irresponsible act of piracy promoted and stimulated by
counter-revolutionary radio stations, the most reactionary elements of the [Cuban exile]
nest of maggots in Miami, and by the well-known failure of the United States to abide by
migration agreements. On 16 July 1994 it published a note from the Ministry of the
Interior saying that the appropriate authorities had investigated circumstances
surrounding the sinking of the tugboat and found that it had taken place as a result of a
collision between the 13 de Marzo and another tugboat which was
attempting to catch up with it. It said that those involved in the escape plan had known
that the 13 de Marzo had been leaking before its departure and that
they had behaved irresponsibly by going ahead anyway. It admitted that the manoeuvres of
the three vessels belonging to the Ministry of Transport in trying to intercept it and
prevent its highjacking had provoked the unfortunate accident but said that
two coast guard units on patrol nearby immediately rushed to the aid of the people on
board and that the three Transport Ministry vessels also joined in the rescue effort. It
said that, given the conditions of navigation and the force of the currents (Force 3) in
the early hours of the morning, only 31 people were rescued alive. The rest of the persons
belonging to the group had been lost at sea and the principal leader was being detained.
An article published in Granma on 23
July 1994 alleged that Fidencio Ramel Prieto Ramos, said to be the organizer of the
escape attempt, who was on duty as operations officer of the Havana port authority, stole
the 13 de Marzo after knocking out the night watchman with a drug which
he had put in his drink. It claimed that the boat, which was made of wood, had been built
in 1879, that it was known to leak and that too many people were on board. It then went on
to cite statements supporting the official version of events allegedly made by four of the
male survivors, who were at the time still in detention without access to lawyers. From
its interviews with two of the male survivors (see above), Amnesty International believes
that there is reason to believe that these statements were made under duress. In one of
the statements, said to have been made by Raúl Múñoz García [see above], he
admitted trying to ram one of the pursuing tugboats early on in the chase. All four
appeared to admit that it was irresponsible of them to have attempted to undertake the
journey in the first place in such a vessel.
he Cuban authorities have never made public
any further information relating to the circumstances of the sinking of the 13 de
Marzo. According to unofficial sources, a very limited police investigation may
have taken place but was reportedly filed in the Havana prosecutor's office, Fiscalía
Provincial de la Ciudad de la Habana. In response to requests by family members and
lawyers, the prosecutor's office reportedly responded in mid-1995 that there were no plans
to initiate legal proceedings in connection with the sinking of the 13 de
Marzo. Relatives of the victims were also told by the authorities that it had
not been possible to locate and recover the bodies of the victims or the boat itself. It
is not clear whether any concerted effort was made by the authorities to do so. However,
from unconfirmed reports some survivors have received from people who were involved in the
rescue, they believe that some of the bodies may have been located and disposed of or
hidden by the authorities.
Calls for investigation from within
Cuba
On 19 July 1994, the Archbishop of Havana
and President of the Conference of Catholic Bishops of Cuba, Monsignor Jaime Ortega
Alamino, expressed his sorrow for the loss of so many lives and said that the
sinking of the vessel, which was carrying women and children, and the difficulties of the
rescue of the survivors do not appear to be in any way accidental. This adds to the sorrow
a feeling of astonishment and a need for the facts to be clarified and responsibilities to
be established.. What can lead a human being to set off on such risky ventures except a
certain degree of desperation or despair? What can lead other human beings to use such
unusual force against their brothers other than a violent mentality?
On 10 July 1995, lawyer René Gómez
Manzano, who has faced problems from the authorities on several occasions before and since
then because of his political views and his professional activities in defence of
political prisonersSee footnote 5, wrote to the
Minister of Justice expressing his surprise that over a year after the incident, the
courts had not carried out an investigation to determine how it had happened. On 20 July
1995, a group of seven other lawyers, including Dr Leonel Morejón AlmagroSee footnote 6, and two members of the public also
sent an open letter to the Minister of Justice and the Attorney General requesting that a
criminal investigation be opened into the events surrounding the sinking of the 13
de Marzo. Both letters questioned in particular why no investigation had been
opened under article 184 of the Cuban Penal Code, Offences committed in the course
of Rail, Air and Maritime Traffic which provides for the punishment of anyone who
causes an accident by failing to abide by the relevant laws and regulations. The second
letter ended as follows: ... until the suspicious deaths of the innocent are
clarified, there will be no light in our country, or in our justice... There is no excuse
for silence, silence cannot be forgiven. Nothing justifies crime, even [if it is carried
out] in the name of the Revolution. That reminds us of when people have been killed in the
name of God... We are waiting for justice to act. As far as Amnesty International is
aware, the authorities did not respond to either of the letters.
International condemnation of the
incident
In October 1996 the Inter-American
Commission on Human Rights of the Organization of American States condemned the sinking of
the tugboat saying that there was clear evidence that it was not an accident but a
premeditated and intentional act. It concluded that it constituted a violation of
the rights to life, physical integrity, free movement and justice. It recommended
that the Cuban Government carry out a full investigation and punish those responsible,
compensate the survivors and relatives of the victims, and take steps to recover the
bodies and the wreck of the boat.
In 1996, in his report to the 52nd Session
of the UN Commission on Human RightsSee footnote 7,
the Special Rapporteur on Extrajudicial, Summary or Arbitrary Executions stated that he
had transmitted allegations concerning the case to the Cuban Government in June 1995 and
expressed deep concern that he had not received a reply. He urged that the allegations be
properly investigated, the perpetrators brought to justice and the victims' families
compensated. The UN Special Rapporteur on Cuba, in his interim report to the UN General
Assembly dated 7 October 1996, also expressed serious concern about the fact that an
event of this magnitude, in which 37 people died, has not been investigatedSee footnote 8.
Subsequent arrests and other
violations relating to the incident
In the days immediately following the
tragedy, the authorities attempted to prevent any protest or public demonstration of
grief. A mass for the victims had to be cancelled and people wearing black armbands as a
sign of mourning were also reportedly detained briefly. Relatives of the victims were also
reportedly prevented from throwing flowers into the sea on the grounds that that is only
usually done for martyrs of the Revolution. On 23 July 1994 Aida Rosa
Jiménez of the Movimiento de Madres Cubanas Por la Solidaridad, Movement of
Cuban Mothers for Solidarity, which had called on Cuba women to wear black or purple
ribbons for three days as a sign of mourning, was arrested at her home and taken to State
Security headquarters at Villa Marista. She was reportedly told by officials that it was
because of her efforts to encourage people to attend a mass in commemoration of the
victims of the tugboat sinking. Seven other human rights activists, Nelson Torres
Pulido, Odilia Collazo Valdés, Oscar Gutiérrez, Lázaro Rodríguez, Martha Losada,
Horacio Casanova and Nelida Vera Pérez, all members of the unofficial Partido
Pro Derechos Humanos en Cuba (PPDHC), Party for Human Rights in Cuba, who were trying
to investigate the events, were also detained on 22 July 1994 and held for three days
before being released without charge.
In December 1994, a woman who lost her
daughter, her brother and two other relatives in the incident made an appeal to
international human rights organizations and governments which concluded as follows:
This crime cannot remain unpunished. We who suffered their [the victims'] physical
disappearance can only cry and be silent. We keep a vigil by their photos with Rapid
Response BrigadesSee footnote 9 standing by. We
have been warned not to put at risk the safety of those who survived. Everything is clear,
we have to keep quiet. But you who are free to shout to the world that incidents like this
should not be repeated must not forget this massacre... We only ask for the remains of our
loved ones and that justice is done for this horrendous crime.
In July 1995, at the time of the first
anniversary of the sinking of the "13 de Marzo", an extensive police
operation was reportedly carried out in Havana to prevent any commemorative activities
from taking place and a number of political and human rights activists were briefly
detained. A mass in commemoration of the victims that was scheduled to take place at the
Church of the Sacred Heart of Jesus was cancelled by the authorities and the church was
closed.
On the second anniversary in 1996, the
authorities again took action to prevent protests or activities commemorating the sinking
of the 13 de Marzo. On 5 July 1996 Isabel del Pino Sotolongo,
president of an unofficial group called Seguidores de Cristo Rey, Followers of
Christ the King, was reportedly arrested in a Havana park where she was displaying the
photos of the victims of the tugboat sinking and distributing leaflets containing quotes
from the Bible. She was released later that day but warned that she was under
investigation on several charges. Aida Rosa Jiménez, who was planning to hold a
prayer meeting in a church on 13 July 1996, was told that she should pray at home. She was
warned that if she tried to go to church that day, she would be arrested.
Conclusions
Given the grave accusations of the
survivors, the contradictory official accounts of the incident and the failure of the
Cuban authorities to carry out a full and impartial investigation and to make the findings
public, as well as the fact that those seeking such an investigation or even simply to
commemorate the incident have faced intimidation and harassment, Amnesty International
believes that there are serious reasons to doubt the official version of events. While
acknowledging that those on board the 13 de Marzo had committed a crime
by stealing the tugboat, there is no evidence to suggest that they were armed or that they
were in a position to offer any serious resistance to the pursuing vessels. Indeed, from
many of the survivors' accounts, it appears that their pleas to surrender and to be
rescued may have been deliberately ignored. Amnesty International has therefore concluded
that at the very least the force employed by the pursuing vessels to prevent the departure
of the 13 de Marzo was disproportionate to the nature of the crime,
especially taking into account the risk to the lives of those on board the 13 de
Marzo who included women and children. The Cuban authorities have argued that
those on board the pursuing vessels were dock workers acting on their own initiative and
not government or law enforcement officials. However, several of the survivors have
doubted this assertion and have alleged that the whole operation appeared to be
coordinated and directed by radio from a coast guard vessel. The Cuban coast guard service
falls under the jurisdiction of the Ministry of the Interior. Amnesty International
believes that there is sufficient evidence to indicate that it was an official operation
and that, if events occurred in the way described by several of the survivors, those who
died as a result of the incident were victims of extrajudicial execution.
Recommendations
Amnesty International is therefore making
the following recommendations to the Cuban Government:
That a full and impartial
investigation into the sinking of the "13 de Marzo" tugboat be carried
out immediately, and that the findings be made public.
That such an
investigation be carried out in accordance with international standards, including the UN
Principles on the Effective Prevention and Investigation of Extra- Legal, Arbitrary and
Summary Executions.
That anyone
identified as being responsible for the loss of life be brought to justice in accordance
with international standards for a fair trial.
That the families
and dependents of the victims be granted fair and adequate compensation within a
reasonable period of time.
That the
relatives of the victims be fully informed of what efforts were made to locate the bodies
of the victims and, if any were found, what happened to the remains.
That survivors or
relatives of the victims be permitted to speak out about what happened without fear of
reprisals.
That no further
reprisals be taken against anyone who seeks to peacefully protest or commemorate the
sinking of the 13 de Marzo.
That no one
should be imprisoned for attempting to leave the country illegally if they have not
committed any other recognizable criminal offence.
That strict orders
be issued to law enforcement officials and agents acting on their behalf to abide at all
times by the UN Basic Principles on the Use of Force and Firearms by Law Enforcement
Officials.
Footnote:
1 The Cuban Constitution declares Cuba to be a socialist state. Only one political
party - the Partido Comunista de Cuba (PCC), Cuban Communist Party - is permitted
to exist.
Footnote:
2 The USA maintains the naval base at Guantánamo Bay on the mainland of Cuba under
the terms of an agreement reached in 1903 when the country was under US occupation. The
lease was renewed in 1934 and although the current Cuban Government, which came to power
in 1959, objects to the presence of the base on Cuban territory, it has continued to
remain there.
Footnote:
3 See footnote 2. Amnesty International has been unable to conduct an investigation
inside Cuba itself because the Cuban authorities have not permitted the organization to
visit the country to carry out research since 1988.
Footnote:
4 Fidelio Ramel Prieto Hernández, the former head of operations at the Port of Havana
as well as a Communist Party official.
Footnote:
5 See Cuba: Government Crackdown on Dissent, AMR 25/14/96, April
1996 See Cuba: Government Crackdown on Dissent, AMR 25/14/96, April
1996
Footnote:
6 Idem.
Footnote:
7 E/CN.4/1996/4
Footnote:
8 A/51/460, 7 October 1996
Footnote:
9 Government-organized groups of Communist Party members, participation of which is
supposed to be voluntary, set up with the aim of defending the country, the
Revolution and socialism in all circumstances, by confronting and liquidating any sign of
counter-revolution or crime, wherever it might appear. Amnesty International has
received frequent reports of acts of intimidation and even physical violence carried out
by such brigades against known dissidents. See Cuba: Silencing the Voices of
Dissent, AMR 25/26/92, December 1992 for further background. Government-organized groups of Communist Party members, participation of which is
supposed to be voluntary, set up with the aim of defending the country, the
Revolution and socialism in all circumstances, by confronting and liquidating any sign of
counter-revolution or crime, wherever it might appear. Amnesty International has
received frequent reports of acts of intimidation and even physical violence carried out
by such brigades against known dissidents. See Cuba: Silencing the Voices of
Dissent, AMR 25/26/92, December 1992 for further background.
AI Index: AMR 25/13/97
Amnesty International July 1997 |